70°19′N 148°42′W
Prudhoe Bay — Alaska IDI node
53°16′N 09°03′W
Galway — Atlantic landing
35°41′N 139°41′E
Tokyo — Pacific landing
Project Alaska IDI · Flagship Deployment · Mazipan OS

Trans-polar
gas-to-compute
corridor.

Alaska IDI is developing power and compute capacity at Prudhoe Bay from stranded North Slope natural gas, for O&G operators, sovereign and enterprise compute buyers. Connectivity is procured from subsea cable providers on the trans-polar route. Capacity is reserved on Mazipan OS standard terms, with deposits held in escrow.

10 GW
Ultimate capacity
1 GW
Phase 1
2031
First tranche target
~231
MMscfd gas Phase 1 (est.)
Trans-polar route
Tokyo → Prudhoe Bay → Galway
↓ Corridor detail
Corridor Architecture

One Alaska node. A trans-polar route.

Alaska IDI develops the Prudhoe Bay node: power generation and compute capacity. Connectivity to the Pacific and Atlantic digital economies is procured from subsea cable providers on the trans-polar route, on the same standard terms available to any buyer.

Prudhoe Bay — North Slope, Alaska
70°19′N · 148°42′W · Alaska IDI
Data center campus co-located with combined cycle gas power generation. Indicatively ~1.5 Tcf of proved gas reserves within a 50-mile radius. Cold ambient conditions raise turbine output above nameplate (indicative, subject to FEED). Site and permitting pathway in development.
Subsea connectivity · procured from provider(s)
Galway — Atlantic Landing, Ireland
53°16′N · 09°03′W · Atlantic landing · third party
Atlantic landing of the Far North Fiber system, developed and sponsored by Far North Digital (FND), which owns the Galway landing station. FNF is the first prospective connectivity provider for Alaska IDI; the route is provider-neutral.
Trans-Pacific subsea segment
Tokyo — Pacific Terminus, Japan
35°41′N · 139°41′E · Pacific landing · third party
Pacific landing of the trans-polar route, interconnecting with the Pacific digital economy. Japanese institutional and export-credit alignment is a prospective financing consideration for the Pacific segment.
Schematic corridor route · Not to scale
PRUDHOE BAY ALASKA IDI · 1 GW Ph.1 GALWAY ATLANTIC LANDING · FNF TOKYO PACIFIC LANDING · FNF SUBSEA CONNECTIVITY · PROVIDER(S) SCHEMATIC · NOT TO SCALE
Arctic Advantage

Physics that cannot be replicated elsewhere.

The North Slope's thermodynamic environment delivers structural performance advantages over temperate and tropical data center locations that compound at scale.

⚡
CCGT Thermodynamic Uplift
Combined cycle gas turbines at Prudhoe Bay ambient temperatures operate materially above nameplate output. Cold dense air increases mass flow through compressor stages — a structural advantage independent of operational choices.
Indicative: +15–25% output above nameplate · 8–12% heat rate improvement · subject to FEED
🌡️
Natural Cooling
Arctic ambient temperatures eliminate or substantially reduce mechanical cooling loads for data center operations. At scale, this advantage compounds: lower PUE, reduced cooling capital expenditure, and structural operating cost advantage over temperate locations.
PUE advantage vs. temperate locations · No evaporative cooling dependency
🔥
Stranded Gas Monetization
North Slope associated gas currently flared or re-injected due to absence of export infrastructure. Alaska IDI is designed as a large-scale commercial pathway for gas monetization at the source — aligning O&G operator economics with data center demand.
Indicative: ~1.5 Tcf proved reserves within 50-mile radius · No gas transport premium
🌐
Trans-Polar Latency
The great-circle route from Tokyo to London via the North Pole is materially shorter than Pacific or transatlantic routes. Connectivity on the trans-polar route gives compute at Prudhoe Bay low-latency access to both Pacific and Atlantic markets.
Shortest Tokyo–London digital route · Geographic moat
🏔️
Seismic Stability
The North Slope sits on stable cratonic geology with low seismic risk relative to Pacific Rim alternatives. Permafrost provides engineered foundation conditions well understood from 50+ years of North Slope O&G infrastructure development.
Proven infrastructure environment · 50+ years O&G operations on the North Slope
🏛️
O&G Infrastructure Heritage
Dalton Highway access, TAPS pipeline corridor, existing Prudhoe Bay utility infrastructure, and established DNR regulatory pathways provide a development environment unavailable in greenfield remote locations. The hard infrastructure already exists.
Dalton Highway · Trans-Alaska Pipeline · DNR framework
Procurement Architecture

OEM discussions initiated.
EPC evaluation runs through FEED; selection follows.

Power generation procurement runs on two tracks, OEM turbine supply and EPC contractor evaluation, converging at FEED initiation targeted for H2 2027. OEM and EPC counterparties are disclosed to qualified participants under NDA.

OEM Turbine Supply — Discussions Initiated
Initiated
Gas turbine OEM — lead discussions
Discussions initiated on a proposed conceptual and pre-FEED study. Advanced-class combined cycle technology suited to modular Phase 1 blocks and anchor-scale expansion.
Parallel
Additional OEMs — parallel evaluation
Evaluated on cold-climate performance, lead-time certainty, service coverage for remote North Slope operations and financing compatibility.
OEM selection criteria: cold-climate performance data, lead time certainty, service and parts availability for remote North Slope operations, and financing compatibility with project structure. Turbine slot reservation is sequenced with anchor reservations; OEM selection is expected with FEED initiation, targeted H2 2027.
EPC Contractor — Evaluation Pre-FEED
Evaluating
Tier-1 EPC contractors — prime
Prime EPC candidates with Alaska, remote combined cycle and LNG delivery experience and strong lender familiarity across project finance markets.
Evaluating
North Slope civil contractors
Civil and structural capability in permafrost foundation engineering, Arctic industrial construction and Dalton Highway logistics.
EPC contractor selection follows FEED initiation (targeted H2 2027). Lump-sum turnkey structure preferred, subject to FEED outputs and contractor appetite. Construction-phase risk transfer (builder's risk, delay in start-up, surety) to be structured with the project's insurance advisor.
Development Timeline

Disciplined sequencing. No compressed timelines.

Alaska IDI follows a disciplined development sequence anchored by regulatory, financing, and procurement milestones rather than aspirational construction targets. Dates are indicative and subject to FEED, permitting and turbine delivery.

✓
H2 2025 – H1 2026
Platform & Instrument Development
Mazipan OS live
CED architecture
Insurance advisor letter of intent (Marsh)
Truist Bank designated escrow agent
O&G anchor outreach
→
H2 2026
Sponsor Formation & Anchor Engagement
Project sponsor formation
O&G anchor NDAs & data exchange
Conceptual & pre-FEED scoping
Capacity declarations live
First reservations sought
3
2027
Pre-FEED & FEED Initiation
Pre-FEED study
Turbine slot reservation
DNR application
Environmental baseline
FEED initiation (H2 2027)
4
2028 – 2029
Permits, Project Finance & FID
PSD air permit
DNR confirmation
Strategic supply chain formation
Project finance mandate
RLN / term financing
Financial close & FID
5
2030 – 2031
Construction & First Tranche
Civil & foundation works
Turbine installation
Data center shell fit-out
Connectivity RFS (provider-dependent)
First tranche target 2031 · 1 GW Phase 1 phased
Demand Architecture

Three counterparty categories.
One demand stack.

Alaska IDI is structured for three distinct anchor counterparty categories, each with a different commercial rationale, engagement trigger, and instrument profile. Together they form the demand stack that makes the project financeable.

Category 1
O&G Operators
North Slope producers converting stranded associated gas into bankable power and compute capacity commitments. Gas monetization economics drive engagement.
› Proved producing assets with associated gas volumes currently without commercial monetization pathway
› Recently sanctioned projects approaching first oil — associated gas infrastructure required concurrent with production
› Private operators without public ESG constraints evaluating gas-to-compute on straightforward commercial terms
Engagement Trigger
Permitting certainty + gas monetization economics
Instrument
Gas Supply Agreement · Power CRA · CED (escrowed deposit) · MARC
Category 2
Sovereign & Sovereign-Fund Offtakers
Sovereigns, sovereign wealth funds and national AI champions with digital infrastructure mandates, reserving long-term compute and power capacity. Sovereign credit standing behind a CRA is the strongest form of credit support in the demand stack.
› Gulf sovereign funds seeking sovereign compute capacity with trans-polar access to Pacific and Atlantic digital economies
› Asian sovereign funds with Pacific digital infrastructure mandates and Japanese institutional alignment via the Pacific connectivity
› Sovereign funds may separately participate as investors in project-level financing; any such participation is disclosed and its demand is reported separately from arm's-length offtake
Engagement Trigger
Sovereign compute access + long-duration infrastructure exposure
Instrument
Compute CRA · CED · co-investment rights (separately disclosed)
Category 3
Telcos, CDNs & Enterprise Compute
Carriers, content delivery networks and enterprise and AI compute buyers that value a compute location on the trans-polar route between Pacific and Atlantic markets.
› Carriers and CDNs seeking compute and colocation at a node on the trans-polar route
› Hyperscaler and enterprise network teams seeking geographic diversity for AI workloads
› Subsea capacity on the route is contracted directly with cable providers (e.g. FNF) on their own terms
Engagement Trigger
Latency position + route diversity
Instrument
Compute CRA · colocation reservation · CED · subsea IRUs via the cable provider
⇄
Credit Support, in Order of Preference
Sovereign and sovereign-fund offtakers whose own credit stands behind the CRA · insurance and surety capacity · cash deposits and bank letters of credit · public infrastructure and development finance · supplier backstops, capped and disclosed. Mazipan OS standardizes, evidences and monitors credit support; the providers stand behind the obligations.
Instrument Requirement — All Categories
CRA counterparties are expected to carry investment-grade or equivalent creditworthiness, or to provide credit support (letter of credit, insurance or backstop). Counterparty credit standing is what makes reservations eligible to be considered for trade credit insurance and financing; eligibility is determined by the relevant insurer, escrow agent and lenders.
Enquiry Process
Capacity reservation enquiries are managed through the Mazipan OS platform and are subject to NDA execution and counterparty registration. No public commitment is implied or should be inferred from participation in the enquiry process.
Mazipan OS Instrument Stack

How Alaska IDI becomes financeable.

Alaska IDI is the flagship deployment of the Mazipan OS instrument architecture — converting anchor demand into escrowed, insurable and financeable commitments.

Step 1
CRA Executed
Anchor executes a Capacity Reservation Agreement confirming its demand commitment
Step 2
CED Deposited
Leg 1 cash deposit held in escrow by Truist Bank · Leg 2 milestone-gated payment commitment
Step 3
MARC Issued
Mazipan Aggregated Reservation and Commitment instrument generated across anchor positions
Step 4
Credit Insurance
Trade credit insurance sought on the milestone-gated commitments, converting commitment into bankable risk transfer, subject to underwriting
Step 5
IRLN / RLN
Reservation-linked notes issued by the project as development-to-institutional financing bridges; Mazipan OS records and monitors, and does not place
Access Mazipan OS Platform Lender Intelligence

Reserve capacity in Alaska IDI.

Anchor tenant capacity reservations, OEM and EPC engagement, and institutional enquiries are managed through the Mazipan OS platform.

Submit Capacity Inquiry info@mazipanos.com
54 Projects LLC · Delaware · info@54projects.com · mazipanos.com